Monday, April 10, 2017

Module 7: Romance: The Rogue Not Taken

MacLean, S. (2015). The rogue not taken. New York City, NY: Avon Books. 978-0-06-237941-2. 
Amazon. (2017). The rogue not
taken. Retrieved from https://
images-na.ssl-images-amazon.
com/images/I/51Gh-k5pgUL.jpg


Summary:
Sophie and her four older sisters are like the Kardashians of Regency England-- or at least her sisters are. That is until Sophie, in the surprise of catching her brother-in-law in the bushes as a garden party with a blonde who was most definitely not her sister, pushes him into a goldfish pond and calls him a “whore” in front of the ton. In complete embarrassment and shame at how the aristocrats completely shun her, Sophie tries to make an escape home with Kingscote “King”, the Marchioness of Eversley and future Duke of Lyne’s carriage, the rake of society who likes to ruins engagements by tangling in the sheets with the young ladies. He denies her plea, so she stows away as his footman. Of course, at the inn the truth comes out: he is not headed to London and she is not Matthew the footman. Banter, stolen carriage wheels, bullet wounds in the shoulder, lost love thanks to carriage accidents, mistrusting fathers, scandalized sisters, and falling in love ensue before Sophie and King get their happily every after.

As a Genre Example:
Like the Saricks text defines and the module notes reiterates, The Rogue Not Taken is a Romance because the love story is the central focus and the two protagonists get a happily ever after. Additionally, the pace is fast, the tone is evocative and emotional, I participated in vicarious emotions, the point of view switches between the male and female leads (although it was first person instead of third person), there is a misunderstanding thanks to lack of communication between Sophie and King, and there is a lot of banter and dialogue rather than emotions. This story would be considered more racy than gentle, but R rated instead of X rated. Like many other Romance novels, it takes place during the extended Regency time period (1830’s) and is a crossover with historical fiction.

Evaluation:
I enjoyed The Rogue Not Taken for the romp it is. No one reads romances to think deeply about the human condition or culture, but to escape, and MacLean has provided a good story of diversion. Sophie is the typical Romance heroine (from my somewhat limited experience of Romances): she thinks herself plain, unspecial, and incapable of being adored/beloved/worshipped by a man. King is like many Romance leads: brooding, has a past where he was wronged in the name of love, but overcomes it to realize Sophie’s love has healed him of that. The banter between Sophie and King, though, make it fun and enjoyable for the reader. I especially enjoyed how often Sophie had to dress like a footman or stableman, yet keep her silk slippers because the boots don’t fit her. Of course, King is the only one who truly recognizes her as a woman despite the disguise. I did not like MacLean’s sickeningly alliterative chapter titles (i.e. “Sleeping Beauty Wakes; No Nuzzling Necessary” and “Rogue’s Reign of Ravishment Resurges”). However, in the Author’s Note at the end, MacLean explains that today’s tabloids inspired her to write this story, so the chapter titles are like magazine headlines... there to catch the eye and make the audience want to read. Instead, they made my eyes roll. I would recommend The Rogue Not Taken to other fans of romance. I would definitely give it an R rating for language and sexy details, so for those who don’t want that sordidness, they should avoid Sarah MacLean’s books.


Reader's Advisory:
Fans of Romance will definitely like The Rogue Not Taken as it covers many of the typical genre characteristics. Those who like historical fiction --and don’t mind the sexy times-- might like this foray into the Romance genre, as well. However, the emphasis is more on the relationship than on historical details and/or setting.

No comments:

Post a Comment