Bowen, R.
(2015). Malice at the palace: A royal
spyness mystery. New York City, NY: Berkley Prime Crime. 978-0-425-26038-8.
Summary:
Photo taken by me. |
As a Genre Example:
As explained in both the ALA textbook and the module
notes, Malice at the Palace is a
Mystery in the Amateur Detective sub-genre and Cozy sub-sub-genre. The case is
a puzzle for Georgie to solve. Georgie doesn’t have any formal detective
training, but her grandfather was on the police force and her boyfriend is in
the secret services department. Georgie investigates parallel to the police’s
investigation because she can be more discreet in her questioning. The body is
found, but it is killed offstage, and there is no blood in the entire book.
Georgie is a female protagonist, who is quite quirky, as is her maid Queenie.
There isn’t really a sense of community, although different characters belong
to different communities: the royals and their sense of duty (minus David,
Prince of Wales), the up-and-coming artiste types who like bacchanalian parties
and sex, and the poor aristocracy who have titles and big manors but little to
no money. Georgie is able to move amongst all three communities with
little-to-no-problems, which also makes her a helpful sleuth for the police who
often ask for her help in solving cases.
Evaluation:
I give Malice at
the Palace 3/5 stars: it was good enough, but not captivating to my reading
interests. I loved all the 1930’s slang: “Bob’s your uncle” and “ducks” as a
commoner’s term of endearment. These little diction tidbits add so much authenticity
to a story. I also appreciated Bowen’s historical note at the end. After
reading a historical fiction novel, I want to know what’s true and what’s
fiction. Bowen’s short note cleared it up in a very succinct manner. I didn’t
like how the ghosts save Georgie from Major B-C. It just seemed too convenient,
and I had to stop rolling my eyes to focus on the words to finish the story.
Georgie was an okay protagonist. Everything is a little too neat: she’s the
only of her friends who doesn’t have sex before marriage, she and her maid Queenie are clumsy, she
just happens to stumble across helpful clues, etc. For RA purposes, of course,
I understand that this “neatness” is all just part of the cozy mystery
suspension of disbelief. As such, I would recommend the Royal Spyness series to
readers who want a jaunty, easy read-- those who don’t read too much into
helpful coincidences that help the story end with all the i’s dotted and t’s
crossed.
Reader's Advisory:
Because the Royal Spyness series takes place in 1930’s
UK, some fans of Historical Fiction will like the series. It may seem like
these books would fit in with fans of Gentle Reads, but our textbook defines
gentle reads as those that don’t include profanity or explicit sex or violence
and adhere to conventional values and happy endings (Saricks, 2009, location
2487). Because Malice at the Palace
includes references to drugs, parties, sex-before-marriage, abortion, and
blackmail, it would not be the best fit for Gentle Reads fans.
No comments:
Post a Comment